Find a Lawyer

ABID versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner filed a complaint under the provisions of Section 3 of the Illegal Settlement Act 2005 which was rejected by the record of validity and an invalid judgment revealed that the applicant. In his cross-examination, he admitted that he owned the land. Never was listed in any of the khasra gurdwaras and as per the khasra gurdwara the accused persons were occupying the suit land The applicant failed to produce any evidence in the conviction that the accused persons were the property occupants. Are former or belong to the occupation group. Which was extremely useful in enforcing the provisions of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, the facts and circumstances have revealed that the dispute between the parties over land acquired was a private dispute and a civil suit was pending. In which a prohibited order was given. The Additional Sessions Judge of the Civil Court justified the dismissal of the complaint filed by the applicant under the provisions of Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, in favor of the accused as they were not present in the circumstances. Illegal, weak, or circle error was not identified Constitutional application was dismissed advocate for immigration from Toru lawyer