Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 379 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 14 Pre-arrest Bail, Defendant's argument that the property was contracted to sell ? The possibility between the complainant's late husband and the accused cannot be ruled out that after the death of the accused who was the tenant of the complainant's husband, the widow / complainant and her children are deprived of their valuable property. A contract for sale was being developed in the community and the courts were taking notice of it alleging that they had been sued for specific performance of the sales contract. The possibility cannot be ruled out that the accused who allegedly committed theft. They know that the complainant was trying to file a criminal case against them, and even managed to file a lawsuit by preparing a so-called sales contract. In addition, the mere execution of a sale agreement was not enough to make the accused a proprietor of the land owned by the complainant, the accused was specifically charged with theft and his recovery is not yet pending. The behavior of the accused before the court, for the first time, was that, after Ed's interim arrest warrant before arrest, the court failed to appear before the arrest, a rare relief aimed at acquittal. Citizens were to be protected, if they were found to be falsely involved in the case. Regarding the accused, it was not enough to prove that the accused would be wrongly involved in the case. advocate for immigration from Murree lawyer