The decision was made in favor of the plaintiff bank for the recovery of sections 9 and 22 car (s) finance suit, the defendant believed that the defendant bank had already recovered the markup amount in monthly installments and the defendant Is also entitled to recover, on the basis of the security deposit given to the plaintiff bank, that the banking court had justified the case, and the defendant bank, on the appeal stage, defendant's claim about the amount of the markup. Which was recovered from the defendant in monthly installments. According to the terms of the lease agreement, the security deposit was not entitled to the banking court's decree, except for the amount of markup already exported by the plaintiff bank in the monthly installments, accordingly the appeal was disposed of. ?
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
