Sections 302 and 109 Qatim Um, the evidence of the benefit of the doubt, was a light platter charged with the principles and it was alleged that the main accused was related to the presence of the deceased through the mobile phone and the presence of the accused in the office. Life sentence is punished with payment of compensation No documentary evidence of telephonic calls was kept on record The investigating officer did not seize the mobile phone or call the main suspect during the establishment of the suspect's SIM card complainant. And in his position, the deceased but the main accused called in a single situation which led to reasonable doubt in the mind of the court and the accused should always be considered innocent as a matter of fact, not the benefit of the doubt. The prosecution's responsibility to prove the crime must depend on the presence of evidence in a case against the accused or should not be interpreted. No speculation can be suggested, however, where the facts of the accused but on the positive and positive evidence of the offense have been proved by the prosecution and the accused's innocence is not reconciled. Can be reconciled, must be proven. Any reasonable speculation, consistent with the defendant's innocence, the case was considered evidence conv The conviction and sentence and sentence had to be dismissed The prosecutor failed to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt Acc r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
