Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 5 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Pro Pharma Promotion Appeal, was resisted on the promise of the ability of the appellant that the applicant would have to file a departmental appeal before the next higher authority against the Secretary's health decision. ? After failing to file an appeal before the next higher authority, his appeal before the service tribunal was premature, however, as the appellant submitted a representation / department appeal to the Secretary Health instead of the next higher department authority. , Should have sent it through. According to the law, the next highest departmental authority, but this has not been done, so the appellant cannot be bothered even if it is deemed that there is pending litigation before the various courts of law which Senior Medical is being promoted for the reason. Officers against the vacant posts of Additional Principal Medical Officer (BS-19) could not be taken up, however, senior senior medical officers should have been promoted against the vacant posts available from the date of availability of the vacant posts, not a happy date afterwards. However, because the delay in completing the promotion process cannot be attributed to the relevant government employees for whom the appellant was considering. As the Pro Pharma Promotion Additional Principal Medical Officer (BS-19), the vacancy against which it was promoted became available to the appellant in terms of monetary terms and otherwise for a long time. The appellant could not have been made without any action or omission. Accepting the appeal, the Department officials face any inaction best law firm from Yazman Mandi lawyer