Find a Lawyer

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER versus MIAN KHAN

Article 18 and 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), AXLI, R33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Acquisition of Land Compensation, Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court Relating to the Past Closing Rule and Scope The Appellate Award was announced on 21 6 1992, which was attacked by some landowners and finally decided on 28 2 2001, in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Appellate Division, the High Court's Division Bench granted some landlords, Took the award with the landowners. The award was not acted upon before any court, once again the award was signed in the year 2003, before the High Court put aside the award and the compensation was exercised by the High Court in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Which was approved by the Division Bench of the High Court and the final verdict was reached. Under the judgment of the Constitutional Jurisdiction of the Division Bench of the High Court, it cannot be changed by a Judge in the Chambers of the High Court. According to the provisions contained in section 454 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the arrest should be made before the Supreme Court, which was the award given on 21 6 1992, therefore, after its decision on its effect, importance and import, Could not be attacked again. 28 2 2001, in an appeal by the Division Bench of the High Court, all land owners who did not object or filed a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 could not benefit from the decision because they Satisfied with the award If such landowners were not satisfied, they could sign the provisions of section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which was never made, power of attorney advocate Hyderabad lawyer