MUHAMMAD SAMI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Questions relating to the facts of fact by the courts under the decree passed in the 1960s, keeping in mind the limitations of section 12 (2) the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the decision of section 3 and the decree, deception and misrepresentation. But, imprisoned in the year, in 1986, the petition filed by Section 12 (2) was granted by the trial court and applied by the lower appellate court as well as the High Court. The authority was raised by the appellant that the High Court decided the constitutional petition without deciding the question. The statute of limitations, any ruling or decision passed by the appellate or review courts should point to the fact that the relevant courts were not only aware but also aware of the question of limitation, before proceeding. The same issue was dealt with with careful application of mind. And just deciding the dispute over merit would not be enough to imagine that the delay was delayed by the Supreme Court. In keeping with the art, the case is remanded to the High Court for a judgment of limitation, in which case any other question may be deemed appropriate and appropriate for a fair trial decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Buchay Key lawyer