GOVERNMENT OF N:-W.F.P. AND OTHERS versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD KHAN
Sections 4, 23 and 24 were added by the court to compensate the land for compensation. High court officials claimed that the fixed price in certain villages applies in the case of price, thus making the compensation arbitrary. I was extended what the High Court made of Axtala (a year average) and a comparative analysis of the average sale of different types of land, after which the price was determined, was neither accepted nor accepted by the High Court. Nor could the extraordinary value of a particular village be applied to the land. The question is why the change of land in this village was confirmed more than a year before the date of notification, in accordance with the provisions of section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and so on. There was no request in that tar. The High Court observed the trend of market price, potential price and inflation and on the tenth time, there was no question of additional burden on the state exchequer. The High Court intervened in the decision of the High Court. Denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
