SYED NAZAR ABBAS JAFFRI versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
R 41 (b) (i) Award of Large Penalty for Government Employees Under political pressure, the cancellation of the charge against the public servant meant that it made no attempt to fill the vacancies recommended by local representatives. K and canceled such appointments sentenced to a two-step reduction in the time scale but the service tribunal changed the penalty to a minor for a two-year withholding penalty. Under the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, the legal charge was not authorized by the MNA / MPA and rules were made to pass such orders. The appointment of a watchdog or any other authority worked without legal authority because it was a case of authoritarian misuse of powers and of not working independently, as shown in one of the official letters on record. That such abuse of powers was inappropriate under the orders of the Public Representative, the Supreme Court turned down the application for leave in appeal and the decision passed by the survey was passed by the CE Tribunal as well as by the authorities. The approved orders were set aside which allowed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lala rukh lawyer