Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ ALIAS NAWAZAY versus STATE

The testimony of Section 13, consisting of senior police officers of the police party, raided the house of the accused, he was arrested on the spot and a Kalashnikov was recovered from his house, which was directly witnessed by rounds and spare chargers. Was the one who showed full consensus on material points and the accused had failed. Identify any contradictions in your statements The significant contradictions made by the accused's lawyer were trivial, on the basis that it cannot be assumed that the prosecution's testimony failed for the police officers, but their There was no reason or encouragement. The credibility of the prosecution's witnesses for misrepresenting the co-accused will not be investigated because the accomplices were found to have been acquitted for the right reasons, which are not questionable. The lawyer for the accused is a serious defect in any investigation. Were not able to identify, minor errors which did not affect the authenticity of the case in the absence of any kind, the strength or weakness was retained in the trial decision. ask a advocate free from Eminabad lawyer