Find a Lawyer

ROMAN ALI ALIAS ALI versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecution witnesses is alleged to have been recovered by Section 13 Illegal Arms Act (XXI of 1991), Section 7 Criminal Code (V9 1898), testimony to the testimony of 103 testimony, while another witness had Kalashnikov. Search and retrieval has been observed. Both the prosecution witnesses acknowledged in their statements that there were three other persons present on the spot besides the accused, but they were not involved in the search and recovery proceedings nor for any reason, Section 103, CRP. Compliance with Article 103 of the C was complied with, the CRPC was not possible only when no one was present except the offender at the search site, plus three, other persons present at the location where the raiding proceedings took place. Was done, but none of them were related to the search CH and recovery process did not meet the requirements of section 103, especially when conditions I was particularly disappointed when no evidence was on the record that it was said that individuals were in the absence of any explanation for the legal confession to become a recovery witness. The legal status of the search, recovery and recovery of the two persons in the area was suspected and the verdict was abolished and the accused was acquitted and released. Was. immigration advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer