HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE
Defining the testimony of Section 324, the lack of prosecution witnesses clearly stated that the accused had fired on the complainant, there was no dispute between the oral and medical evidence at the time of the incident, the identity of the accused was not suspected. In the case, the accused was acquitted. In such cases, the trial court will not prosecute the suspects in any way, since they were not charged with any effective firing in the FIR, the accused was properly punished. But the accused was sentenced to three years. 10,000 a year with a fine of Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Cherat lawyer
