Find a Lawyer

GUL AMIN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Evidence Definition The benefit of the doubt was not in the record to link the accused with any credible evidence prosecution commission even where the suspect failed to disclose any relationship with the motor vehicle where prohibited. The marijuana and opium were recovered, either in the owner's or driver's or other capacity or with the possession of the prohibited marijuana and opium, which was recovered from the car's robbery and toe mats, where the prohibited contents were hidden in a vehicle. Was found lying, which it was not known. In order to inspect and recover a vehicle, it was necessary to obtain specific information about its concealment, in which case the mere presence of an individual in the vehicle cannot be held liable for the conscience of such prohibited articles. Was. Prosecutors further indicated that he was aware of the presence of the prohibited material or was concerned with the vehicle on the basis of his conscious possession of such prohibited articles hidden in the vehicle and on the evidence on record. It cannot be said that the investigating agency was successful in establishing a link between the motor vehicle suspects and the prohibited material. To the extent of the actual accused, the prosecution was unable to establish its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt; the trial was not based on the proper, fair and legal definition of the court's decision, record and evidence in the prosecution case. He was entitled to be acquitted of the charges in the circumstances of the trial, the trial court's decision was put in the direction that the accused should be released from jail. family advocate from Shogram lawyer