MUHAMMAD AMJAD ALIAS ANJOO versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FEROZEWALA, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA
Article 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Determining the age of the accused applicant / accused who claimed underage at the time of the incident. The Medical Board, based on the order of the trial court, to determine its age, submitted that the applicant's date of presence was approximately 17/18 years, however, despite receiving the medical board's report, there was no justification, Judging another applicant's question, the prosecutor's evidence was ordered to be recorded and the verdict was adjourned at the time of the final decision of the trial. Otherwise, the applicant's course through the trial court was law's disadvantage because in this case the issue of puberty or the case of the accused / applicant had to be decided first, setting aside the prescribed order before the trial proceedings. Was done or it could be decided by a question related to young people. Applied first and then proceed with the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer