Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 377, 355, 384, 500 and 511 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), arrest prior to Section 12, the termination of the charges against the accused and Canceled, his co-accused was that, at Pistol Point, he forced the affected boy to accompany him to Bethuk, a 16-year-old accused. Where he tried to defame him and his nude photographs were taken at the pistol point and then blackmail the victim on various occasions and recovered the money from his arrest in the absence of it. Earlier bail was granted, nothing was on record to show that the accused was involved. Neither the illegal court nor any aspect of the case was considered by the lower court, while guaranteeing the arrest of the respondent, which was an unusual relief, which was not given in the routine investigation. Not to be discouraged or prevented from blocking pre-arrest bail It was passed by the police in the case of wanted arrest with no good cause or extraordinary purpose, no charges against the investigating agency were available, The arrest of the accused may be implicated for any alleged motive while the improper order was ignored. The discretion to grant pre-arrest bail was not completely exhausted under the pre-arrest bail approval and post-arrest bail approval rules; the bail is not suitable for pre-arrest bail, with the order approving the bail. The bail was set to accept the cancellation request. Yourself immigration advocate from Rawala Kot lawyer