Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Charged with the arrest of a bond of Securities 514 Offenses (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (2), 13 and 14 bail for which the applicant was executed on the bond as a guarantor. Had failed to appear in court, bail bonds were forfeited. And the notice was issued under Section 141414, the applicant / bail guarantors were denied the CR PC to execute the bail bonds, but the bonds issued and executed by them were signed by them. And the signature of the person who identified the applicant at the relevant time. After satisfying the identity of the bail and witnesses, the relevant court had always accepted the bonds, integrity and consistency were attached in the judicial proceedings; after the execution of the bonds of the bail, the applicant / bail was merely highly processed. Volunteer faces may not be allowed to refuse. In connection with the bail, similar process cannot be allowed for the petitioner to be bound and executed on the guarantee of bail, the bond of bail was not processed, the accused was canceled. The bail was set on bail and failed to appear in court to stand trial even after the expiry of three years and was fugitive, the application against the order to seize the bail bail was not acceptable once. When the accused jumps on the land of the bailout, the entire amount of the bail will be seized in the absence of any circumstances. Ltd will. No mitigating circumstance was found in favor of the petitioner's position, of which top civil advocates from Bhakkar lawyer