Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ THROUGH ATTORNEY versus MUHAMMAD AMIN TRUST CHAKWAL THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Sections 13 and 23 (1) (a) of the pre-emption charitable trust suite were purchased by the charitable trust for the construction of the hospital on which the suit and appeal filed by the pre-emptor were rejected by the trial court and the appellate court. The accuracy record, respectively, did not deny that the seller was a trust or a devotee and purchased a property such as a dead trust that was a registered document establishing a hospital for modern purposes of trust and the Wendy's Trust Chairman. Service witnesses from the surrounding area testified and it was stated that the land was purchased for the construction of the hospital but Chi He did not have a single question raised to challenge Erdmann's statement, in which the evidence of the witnesses, including the witnesses, was silent in that regard. The two courts below concluded that the land was purchased for a similar purpose and that the charitable trust was the property of plain 23 (1) (Pre) Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1. 199 showed that the prohibition relates to the sale of dedicated property or property used for charitable purposes, however, for the purpose of the Legislature, to use the property purchased for the charitable consumer clearly in favor of The Act contained in Section 23 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act, 1991, was applicable under the circumstances. advocate for immigration from Khyber Agency lawyer