Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302/34 Evidence Definition Benefit of Doubts Disputes between medical evidence and the account of an accuser, a duplicate sword accused / appellant alleging that in the morning he had killed three people with a 12-bore gun, as The FIR alleged that the accused wanted to keep his wife's real sister in his home, but the legal proceedings against his will led to the triple murder charge that killed the unknown assailants. And was involved in the trial court in which the trial court sentenced and sentenced the accused to death. Both witnesses were extraordinary on the suspect and witnessed the occasion. The ocular account presented by eyewitnesses was not a matter of confidence; the incident, the eye witnesses' behavior and the accused, as the witnesses described, were not credible, no crime was vacant. Eye witness accounts were not endorsed by medical witnesses. For example, according to the FIR, the accused opened fire on one of the deceased, but according to medical evidence, the latter had only one firearm injury, with the blacks being black around him, both witnesses testified. Not only did their statements improve dishonestly, but they also contradicted each other. On the material points, the complainant admitted that the accused's wife had been married to another person before, but she escaped from the accused and the act of the accused and his wife felt disrespectful to the complaining party and The accused faced enmity against the Motive because of the double stripe. Cutting both ways and in this context immigration advocates phone number from Makli lawyer