ZULFIQAR ALIAS GULZAR versus STATE
Section 302 (b) definition of evidence They were witnesses of the occasion and had tense relationship with the accused The victim suffered two injuries and witnesses did not mention that the accused had reloaded his carbine, no vacant place. Was not recovered, two wounds could not have been caused by the carbine without reloading; if the prosecutor's witnesses were present, they would not have allowed the assailant to reload their carbine, the witnesses testified during the trial. Had made dishonest improvements, no independent witnesses were available near the scene, never presented at trial Arrived because no one was associated with the recovery of the people. The allegedly used weapon was never sent to a forensic science laboratory prosecution, in which case, it failed to prove beyond any doubt against the accused, an appeal was granted, the trial court ruled And the accused was acquitted of all charges and released from jail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Punch lawyer