Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN ALIAS SHAMMA versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Bell, further inquiry into the case filed with the grant of FIR with a delay of 9 days Was gone The explanation for the delay was not confirmed by the Medical Legal Report and Chemical Examiner's report that the accused with the victim had committed misconduct, as one of the prosecution's witnesses took an affidavit stating that he The incident was not observed and his name was incorrectly presented. The witness in the case is pending a criminal trial between the suspects regarding the testimony of the other prosecutor and stated that the possibility of the other prosecutor's accusation of making false accusations cannot be ruled out, in which case the accused has been in the story for seven days. Kept with him, but meanwhile no report could be filed with the police, but no other prima facie evidence was available on the record other than the complainant's statement so he could contact them in advance. The suspect associated with the commission of the crime was a 47-year-old with three daughters and two sons who were living in the joint family system with his parents, the fact of the complainant's statement that medical evidence was not supported by him The result will be seen by the trial court. The case was allegedly successful for the time being submitted, and submission of challan in court was not the only basis for denying the bail of the accused who had succeeded in making further investigation and bail. May be. Not to be punished because the accused has no progress in the trial and his jail term property advocate from Fizagat lawyer