Find a Lawyer

NASIR MEHMOOD versus STATE

The applicant / accused filed for the suspension of the Section 426 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) conviction claimed that the pieces of evidence were disclosed through the trial, which is not proved on record. The Assistant Advocate General had stated that it had raised the dispute. The accused needs to re-examine the evidence which could not be exercised by the High Court under section 4726. The legal status of the CCP Assistant Advocate General was not retained as the court recorded in its judgment that the accused had recorded They were admitted because of extra judicial confession made by them. Wanting evidence, the trial court also found that the motive behind the incident was unknown, and that the victim was last seen alive in the company of the accused, it was of such a weak nature that the applicant suspended the sentence. Was excluded. The sentence filed by the trial court, suspended, in the circumstances law firms from Choppar Hatta lawyer