Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ

The offense under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), with the specific role of cancellation of the accused named in Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 148, 149 and 109, FIR, CR The shot of the PC Fire Shot Straight The chest of influence against the injured accused / respondent was that he, along with his companions, armed the rifle and shot the complainant's brother on the left side of his chest. And after that, the two co-accused opened fire with their own weapons, which led to the arrest of the injured trial court two and a half months after the arrest by the trial court on the basis that the investigating officer had it. He said the suspect used his gun in retaliation and it was not yet determined who the attacker was and the suspect did not repeat the firearm. On his chest; it was surprising that the trial court granted the arrest warrant after the defendants were charged with the section 497 (1), CCPC's prohibiting clause, and that too, led to his arrest. Months later on the basis that the investigating officer said the suspect had used it. The gun in retaliation and it was not yet decided who was the trial court offensive witness that the applicant did not fire repeatedly, therefore, his intention to kill was suspected, as the applicant was allegedly Had just fired straight at his victim. The rifle and the firearm came to the left of the chest. During the trial of the trial, the court tried to work the trial and further investigation led to the precarious condition of the injured and his non. Sure advocate for immigration from Khair Pur lawyer