Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAKOOR AND REHAN SAFDAR versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

R 6 (iii) (i) Use of Domicile Certificate, Domicile Appellate Transfer first joined the provincial service on the basis of Punjab Domicile but subsequently for Central Superior Services against the Domicile of the Public Service Commission of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Request Their residents were accepted for the province of Punjab, which was imprisoned before the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction approved by the Commission but to no avail, the High Court correctly observed that Government services do not just mean the service of the Federation of Pakistan, but it also includes services. Provinces that were accepted / incorporated by appellant on the basis of the Domicile Certificate of this area, once a person is resident in a particular area under R6 (iii) (i) of the Competitive Examination Rules. Had intended. , 1996, could not replace its domicile certificate later for the purpose of obtaining such individual H's benefit, the court was justified in not issuing a writ in favor of the appellants dismissed. lawer from fb area from Sakardu lawyer