SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS versus SYEDA ZIL-E-SUBHANI JEHAN ARA BEGUM
Article 212 (3) The Advance Increment Intelligence Service Tribunal did not review the question of whether the defendant was entitled to give advance increments in light of the rules / policies governing this article and allowed defendant's appeal only on the basis that Authorized authority provided. An increase in three other people who were similarly named as respondents, and since advance increment was called by the expert in three articles illegally. And since there can be no similar action for a judicial forum on the illegal movement by someone, the parties' advice agreed that the matter be referred to the Service Tribunal so that This matter may be further considered and then determined. If the respondents were entitled to raise questions in respect of the relevant rules / policies, the application was converted into an appeal and allowed, resulting in an unanimous decision and on the same issue. The matter was referred to the Service Tribunal for a fresh decision. n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
