QAZI MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND ANOTHER
Article 212 (3) Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification & Discipline) Rules, 1999, R4 (1) (b) (v) Appeal for dismissal of the applicant, who was a food grain supervisor. Was processed. Others suffered a heavy wheat shortage at their center; on regular inspection, the applicant was convicted and on the recommendation of the competent authority, the competent authority passed an order under which the price of wheat was reduced. The applicant was dismissed from the employment order. Appeal to the department relating to the applicant and then before the service tribunal, the accused in charge of having been excluded from unknown decision, had stated in writing that there was a shortage of wheat reserves and he had forged fake films. The record has been prepared for wheat bags for leave to appeal for leave in the meaning of Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution, there was no specific question of law of public importance, so that the Supreme Court sought intervention. Go \ \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
