Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, QUETTA versus MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LTD. THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 62 British Balochistan Foreign Wine and Country Spirit Regulations, 1947, R4 (4) [as amended by Notification No. SO (E&T) 234 Tax / 99/769 78, dated 20 8 1999] The provincial government has imposed special costs on the constitutional petition before the High Court Maintenance Liability Standards, 1980, AXXVIII, R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 (1). Import duty was levied on all liquor supplies on the basis that notification number SO (E&T) 234 tax / 99/769 78, dated 20 8 1999, passed by the Balochistan Government. Or more, the use of constitutional jurisdiction, respondents than companies located in Balochistan High Court was the appropriate location. The petition filed by the petitioner was allowed and the notification was declared without legal authority that the PLA had raised by the authorities that the defendant was not a provocative person under Article 199 (1) of the Constitution. There was no locus standi to submit the request. The Corrective Responder failed to show that it was an outrageous party because it was not charged a fee and never paid the same to the respondents who were ever licensed. Did not complain The increase in the price of this product and the resulting increase in the price of the product due to the sale of the product or any of them refused to supply the product to the third party (Licensee) (S) cannot be allowed to hear a case for which payment is due jobs for fresh advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer