IMTIAZ AHMED LALI versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD LALI
Article 8D (2) (i) of the Representation People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Articles 67 (3) and 99 (1a) (i) [as amended by the Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXVI of 2002). ] Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975, RR 2 (III) and 4 (2) (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 63 [which has been amended by the Legal Framework Order 2002, (Chief) Executive Order No. 24 of 2002) Conducting Elections A candidate for disqualification and morally incompetent Appellant contested the election for the Member Provincial Assembly and was declared successful because of the lawsuit against the Appellant. Of gambling / moral misery Police were dismissed on the charge. Granted the application, put the election aside and instructed to hold fresh elections. The demand raised by the appellant was that the absence of duty would not constitute a mismanagement of moral background and could not be disqualified. Employees of the department were subjected to disciplinary action under Punjab Police (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules 1975, therefore, the definition of misconduct under the rules would apply. Despite being disqualified. According to the law, therefore, for such permanent disqualification, it cannot be allowed to become a member of an independent body of Parliament or Provincial Assembly, with the intention that Article 63 of the Constitution, Representation of People Act, 1976 As well as Article 8D of the Conduct of General Elections of Order, 2002, was amended to prevent the approval of those who were involved in mismanagement or moral turpitude.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Khanewal lawyer