IQBAL AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, KARACHI
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Appointment Applicants' position was that they had cleared all the tests but failed to produce any documents to show that they had cleared the interview / voices and made the appointment. In the absence of any evidence in this regard was recommended. Applicants were not entitled to appointment Applicants were subjected to disproportionate treatment, inaction, modesty and gross negligence in the enforcement of their rights for any reason and created a situation of termination of their own rights and Were not careful in protecting their interests. Their affiliation constituted a right in favor of the defendants and others who were appointed as applicants and were not brought before judicial appointments. In the present case, persons were to be made in 1995. Applicants whose age was between 18 and 28 years are considered 18 years after 1995. After 12 years, they all crossed the upper limit of 28 years and were not eligible for appointment. The constitutional application was rejected in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
