Find a Lawyer

MST. TASNEEM AKHTAR versus L.D.A. THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL

Construction of the plot was lifted in 1975, after obtaining a sanctioned plan from the Municipal Corporation, sections 42 and 53 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, R1 and 2 suits and decree plaintiffs. According to which the defendants asked to remove the construction. There were violations on the plot adjacent to the artillery authority, the plaintiffs' requests for an ad hoc order were rejected by the courts which established below the record of accuracy that in the first phase of litigation in the case, the civil court ruled that It was demanded that the plaintiff took up the construction on his own plot and no encroachments were made on the adjoining plot and the same was confirmed by the Supreme Court. It was not alleged that the plaintiff had made a new breach of infringement, only to prevent the plaintiff from interfering with his possession by requesting an ad hoc order. The first case in his favor and he suffered irreparable harm and loss if the defendants were not prevented from demolishing his house which was approved by the Building Control Authority dispute that the plaintiff had no annex to the adjoining plot. Then it had to be resolved in the last phase of litigation and it committed illegal and material irregularities in the proclamation of salvation. The High Court accepted the claimant's request for ad interim order. \ R \ n \ r \ n best law firms from Chak 46 lawyer