Find a Lawyer

JAVED AKHTAR versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) / evidence of evidence Definition benefit The prosecution's case revolved around the evidence presented by two eye witnesses, who were the brother and uncle of the accused, respectively, according to these statements. Is needed because the complainant is in conflict between the party and the deceased. The nature of the injured person in the statements of the prosecution witnesses shows that the prosecution's witnesses were not present because of the injuries, the prosecution's testimony was denied by medical evidence, the prosecution in the site plan There was no mention of the witnesses' presence. The post-mortem report contained hostility between the parties at the time of the victim's death and statements from the prosecution witnesses, which eliminated both methods, which could be one of the reasons for the murder, and especially when the prosecution witnesses were also attacked. In the circumstances, the prosecution did not raise the suspect's alleged rifle received at the forensic science laboratory about 8 days after the 7 mm vacancy in the laboratory. Was, there was no independent witness involved during the recovery process, although the accused was not acquitted. If it is legally proven, then only and as evidence, the accused is evidence and can be used, even though the prosecution's witnesses were not present at the time of the incident, however, the prosecution did not have any evidence in the prosecution's case. Will not help, the prosecution case was not doubtful, the trial court was put aside and the accused was acquitted of all charges and released advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer