Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMEER versus SYED SHUJAT ALI TIRMIZI, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KHUSHAB

RR 35 and 71 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Re-counting of Belt Papers Respondents' Failure of Respondents, Suspended as a result of the Election before the Election Tribunal, After the recording of the evidence, the Election Tribunal re-filed the ballot papers. In counting, the respondents were declared legitimate as retired candidates, apart from legal reasons, which weighed in with the Election Tribunal to count ballot papers, no doubt the controversial polling station The Presiding Officer of the CA issued two different results, one of the forms was in the twelfth, in which Surely those who received 342 votes. And the respondents were mentioned 51 votes, while the other results were counted on the file which showed 242 of the applicants and 613 presiding officer of the polling station who was examined as a poll of the respondents. Clearly excludes the latter. The office of the moderator / deputy was created by him and was not underscored. The presiding officer of his signature also stated that the result of the controversial polling station was right after all. Cross-examined in the lines but did not contest his conclusions and chose to present his evidence at closing time. , His lawyer's statement drew correct conclusions from the Election Tribunal without committing any law / fact error, as there was enough material on the record to justify the re-counting of ballot papers. Sufficient evidence / evidence on record to justify the count famous supreme court advocate from Dijkot lawyer