Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus STATE

Section 498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement of the Ordinance) Ordinance (VII of 1979), bail before arrest of sections 10 and 16, cleared of undisclosed delay in filing an FIR that they had acted in accordance with the complaint of the accused along with other accomplices. Abducted and Convicted of Adultery The pre-arrest pleas filed by the accused were dismissed by the sessions court on the ground that they had failed to appear in court on the said date. Delay of 5/6 days in filing of FIR; Section 16 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, was not attracted to the accused's case and that it was a crime related to adultery, hence the matter. The Superintendent of Police was to be investigated, but in the case of the accused's inquiry, it was made by the Deputy Superintendent of Police and confirmed by the Superintendent of Police, which was against the law. Specifically named in the FIR and the specific role of abducting a woman at gunpoint and committing adultery with her, the accused was named, in two police investigations, fully involved in the case. Went to the Independent Witness Investigation Officer and filed a motion to file a statement under Section 161, CRPC, in support of a lawsuit, delaying the filing of such case. Had no results. The Sessions Court dismissed on the ground that the accused failed to appear in the court on the said date, thus, a temporary review of the evidence regarding the sanction of interim pre-arrest bail by the misunderstood court was revealed. On the record for linking the accused to the crime under section 10 of the Ordinance immigration advocates email from Babri Banda lawyer