Section 13 (d) Definition of Illegal Weapon Evidence 3 The testimony of police officers, presented by the prosecution, provided considerable contradictions in their position. The trial court found that the evidence of police officers was as good as the others. It does not prove that even corruption is encountered. The trial court did not rely on the law of any case, nor was any reference to a law, for the police involved or involved in the indictment, but in support of its version. , The trial court in its judgment observed that the accused had failed to bring. The record exists on any evidence to show that he was falsely prosecuted because of any enmity with the police in the case of the prosecution suspected that the evidence on the record was in any way Was not sufficient to conclude that the accused could be. The perpetrator of the crime charged against him was not justified by observing the trial court's invaluable verdict that the prosecution had succeeded in taking the court home. Evidence of prosecution trial court against the accused beyond the veil of reasonable doubt. The incident in the densely populated area was not a one-day incident, but no reasonable resident of the area came forward as a witness to the incident. The testimony of the incident was not disturbing and could not be relied upon without any independent co-operation. The police knew in advance about the suspect's presence at the scene, but they were searching the area for investigation and recovery. Not to the free person
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
