Articles 17 (2) and 79, Agreement 17 (2) of the Agreement were read with Article 79 of the Law, Martyrdom, 1984, its implementation makes it clear that the document which created the financial obligation was confirmed by two witnesses. And likewise the plaintiff presented only one backward witness who was illiterate, unable to identify the fake document while the other marginal witness, without sufficient explanation, was not examined by the plaintiff, even the author Was also not checked to prove the execution of a sale agreement that was not on stamp paper. Although he was the plaintiff on a plain paper, although he himself appeared before the court but he was not signed, the provisions of Article 17 (2) and Article 79 of the Convention of 1984 were not complied with, the High Court intervened. Was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
