Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIR versus STATE

Section 7 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Trial of the Young Court Medical Agent's Age-Determination School Leave Certificate or Birth Certificate Under Section 302, PPC of the Scope / Preferred It was filed and challan was presented by the Sessions Judge, who reviewed the case as the accused was 19 years of age and argued that the Sessions Judge had determined the age of the accused under Section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000. And her age is in accordance with her school leaving certificate. And the birth certificate was less than 18 years, so he was the slightest complainant that the session judge based his opinion on the medical board report and only about the age of the material available on file from the medical board under section 7. This can be determined only after receiving the report. The Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, stated that the legislature's intention was that a suspect was not protected on the basis of a school leaving certificate or birth certificate, therefore, a reason report should be obtained from the medical board for this purpose. Because birth certificates or school leaving certificates are readily available, the juvenile court can decide whether to go it alone. Whether or not the accused was a child due to irrelevant documentary evidence and after obtaining medical opinion, in the present case, the accused's birth certificate, 19 years and 3 months, proved that the accused challenged the entries in the birth certificate. But he failed to prove that these entries were altered or declared bogus by the competent authority Sessions Judge Dentist and Hospital Consultant Surgeon and Birth Certificate best law firm from Kamokey lawyer