By denying the contents of the FIR's statement of section 497 (2) fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 and 11, two more witnesses, Victim further charged with further investigation. More often described. The only effect was that they saw the victim in the company of the accused and did not claim to be the eyewitness to the statements of the adulteress, saying that the witnesses faced a delay of twenty-one days at the trial. will have to do. The FIR further investigated that no further direct evidence was available in the case; the medical examination of the victim was done twenty-two days after the incident and therefore no arrests were made. ? He was behind bars after the suspect was arrested and charged. Was not presented The preliminary conclusion of the trial was the accused's right and could not be guaranteed as a matter of conviction. The accused was successful in the trial, as it was further investigated. Attempted to guarantee
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
