Find a Lawyer

MST. SIRAJ BIBI versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

The purpose of the trial gift for the declaration of the terms Su42 Title Prerequisite was that the plaintiff declared the result of corruption due to a change in the gift and there were male cases of being a married woman, they had no defendant. There were brothers, the two courts together dismissed the case, as well as the contradictions on the face of the record of justification, the full written statement headed by the defendants and the whole evidence was silent as to why the plaintiff granted them a gift suit. Nothing was suggested to him in the witness box as to why he made the gift. Such circumstances were of great importance and it was formally noted that the Supreme Court declared the gift. There was no evidence available about its acceptance and the possession of it, with no evidence to show that the decisions and orders given by the courts below were the result of gross misrepresentation of the evidence on record. The High Court, using the jurisdiction of the review, set aside the decisions and orders passed by both the courts and issued their orders, they filed a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff. online advocate from Dargai lawyer