Find a Lawyer

KAURO versus STATE

Section 302 Evidence Defined The benefit of the doubt was the prosecution's trial hearing on the conviction of ocular testimony and alleged oral testimony that was full of exaggeration, contradictions, contradictions and improvements, being untrustworthy and untrustworthy. Couldn't safely be relied upon. The witness was present at the scene and at the place and time of the incident. The alleged confession was withdrawn by the accused. If voluntary and truth is found, the confession of the rebellion can be established without any confirmation, but the procedure and As a strategy, it should be supported and material details can be confirmed through another source, the suspect's conduct in the case and the police, in certain circumstances of the case, voluntarily spoke of the accused's confession. And said that the suspect was confessed to the crime, voluntarily, not relying on The Assistant AG also did not cooperate. In the absence of any other evidence linking the accused to the commission of a confession, the prosecutor's case was highly suspicious. The accused, in the circumstances, was entitled to the benefit of the doubt, according to which the appeal Was allowed ask a advocate free from Tharparkar lawyer