SAYED GHULAM MUSTAFA versus STATE
Sections 156 and 551 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 194 Investigation of the Case The trial court rejected the Deputy Superintendent's subsequent report on the grounds that it was investigated by or under an officer in charge. After investigation. There was no provision in the Code of Conduct for further investigation or inquiry by the President, the police station, the valid theory taken by the trial court was not correct as the investigation had no end, they were subject to the execution of the sentence. It may continue later, otherwise it would not be possible to convict an impostor under section 194, second part of PPC, on the basis of the evidence of which some innocent person was convicted under Section 551, C. Under the RPC, a high-ranking police officer could be hanged, enjoying the powers of the police charge officer. Despite the entire locality to which he was assigned to the court, the report of the investigation was neither binding nor binding on any one, but, this would not mean that before the recording of the evidence, The material contained in the report should not have been taken into account mainly by the Investigation Agency, which was to be considered and considered for subsequent investigative reports. In the same way that people had before
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer