ZEESHAN HYDEER versus STATE
Definition of evidence in section 409 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2). Prosecuting witnesses said that the money involved in the case was received by the accused for the repair of the vehicle, which acknowledged the receipt of the money, saying on oath they had given the money to Motor Transport in charge. The Thee accused had prepared a photostat copy of the receipt of the money, but the prosecutor denied the same to the plaintiff that he did not present any evidence to prove his case and the signature expert had to compare the signatures. Invoice not sent for. It said that the receipt with the approved signature of the motor transport in charge, which was paid in the dispute after the prosecution proved its case against the accused, was tried and sentenced by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Thatta lawyer
