Find a Lawyer

DURO ALIAS DUR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Definition of Articles 332, 148 and 149 Evidence of the benefit of doubt The prosecution's case was that first police officers caught buffalo from the house of an accused and then the complainant produced counsel but the prosecution was not presented and stated that counsel Version prosecution supported. It was further alleged that an encounter took place between the culprits and the police party, but no empty information was found on the spot where the police party opened fire on the accused, when the policemen arrived at the police station after the alleged encounter with the incident site. They must. When he left the police station, no evidence was presented to determine how much ammunition was given to each police officer and how much was returned to the officer concerned who suspected the prosecution's story. Medical evidence was created that the distance between the culprits and the injured witnesses was too long, there was a mistake in identifying the culprits, whose number was 10, could not be denied, after a prosecution witness saw the accused in the dock. They were identified and no further evidence was presented that linked the suspect to the commission of the crime, Assistant Aid The Wokate general also did not support the anonymous decision. The prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt, they deserved the benefit of the doubt, which was accordingly granted to them. patent advocate from Neelam lawyer