Find a Lawyer

S.M. AFZAL-UR-REHMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS

Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Dismissal of employment The government employee representing the time-barred department was dismissed from service and dismissed his departmental representation by 185 days by the dismissal of the service tribunal. Prior to this, the appeal was also submitted by a public servant. Did the letter of removal from the job were received by his brother, with whom the civil servant was not on reasonable terms, if anyone had shown negligence and evil in prosecuting his treatment before the appropriate forum? The court was not entitled to sentence, extending the time to 185 days, especially when the department was not favored by its departmental representation, not using discretion in favor of a public servant, the tribunal Neither acted illegally nor was there any strong ground for interference in the exercise of arbitrary, arbitrary grounds. By a tribunal that was neither unfair nor illegal or irrelevant, once the appeal was dismissed over time, the appeal of the service would be ineligible, unless, for various reasons, The Tribunal deemed it appropriate to delay the service. The Tribunal ruled otherwise that the Supreme Court refused to take any concession. No leave on appeal of the question of public importance law was refused. pakistani advocates Matli lawyer