Find a Lawyer

NAIK MUHAMMAD versus MAZHAR ALI

R17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 199, District Officers (R) appointed as Appointment of Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution in the jurisdiction of the Provincial Board of Revenue Scope Petition. What was Responding to the recommendations of the relevant authority, the respondents filed an appeal against the appointment of the applicant before the Executive District Officer (R), which was accepted and appointed as respondent as the liberty petitioner reviewed it before the Member, Board of Revenue. Filed a constitutional petition against the member's finding of the same respondent, the Board of Revenue, which the petitioner of the High Court had accepted that the High Court had rejected the Law of the Member Board of Revenue Who has the right under the law to decide the matter rightly or wrongly and only the right It was decided that hand. False Board did not present decision of the Board of Revenue without legal authority The High Court has the power to consider the arbitrary decision made by the Member Board of Revenue of the petitioner that the Member Board of Revenue has a right to any case Have the right to decide or have no power in the eyes of Article 4 of the Constitution. The error of the Board of Revenue in understanding the law, applying it or identifying the law was to be corrected by a member of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction; the Board of Revenue misrepresented the record and The appeals court's findings were overturned. No justification; therefore, the High Court upheld the Board of Revenue not to remand the matter. The High Court observed attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Pindi Bhattian lawyer