DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KASUR AND OTHERS versus MISS JAMIL AKHTAR
Section 3 and 10 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) were filed against the decision of the Tribunal under which the employees employed them. Appeal filed against dismissal Dispute accepted, this employee's appointment was not made by the Admissions Committee, but his appointment was made on the recommendation of the Deputy Commissioner, before the authorities from the service tribunal. Neither the letter nor the letter on the basis of which the Deputy Commissioner recommended the appointment of the employee. Neither can it be considered nor allowed to step in at any interval which confirms the deputy district education officer's dismissal, especially in the deserted phase for inadequate respondents in this situation. Cannot be understood. When no such request was made before the service tribunal's request was dismissed and the leave was denied \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
