SARDAR NASEER AHMED MOOSIANI versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE/CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Section 21 Notification No. 5 41/2004 (BLCEA) / Volume VIII / 2692 2700, Dated 12 5 2006 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Determining the truth and authenticity of the resignation The options for the complaint were that Nazim refused to resign from this seat, but the alleged resignation was accepted by the government. Has the High Court appreciated the legal and factual aspects in this context, while rejecting the preferred constitutional request from the applicant? Whether the truth and authenticity of the resignation allegedly resigned by the applicant was above or beyond the board. Did the Chief Minister act diligently using the powers under Section 21 of the Balochistan Local Government Ordinance 2001, and accept the alleged resignation by the applicant. However, the acceptance of the resignation under Malala is especially heightened when there was a clear refusal by the applicant to make such a resignation and it was published in various newspapers. If the applicant performed his duties as the moderator after the alleged resignation and it was in the knowledge of the provincial government. Whether the applicant had any legal right to claim the seat of the Nazim on the basis of Notification No. 5 41/2004 (BLCEA) / Volume VIII / 2692 2700, dated 12 5 2006, under which he was entitled Whether or not an officer was charged and a decision was made by him. The High Court was in accordance with the law of the Supreme Court under which the law was designated as Muhammad Munir-ul-Haq and Muhammad Latif Chaudhry, 1992, SCMR 2135.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
