Find a Lawyer

ZAIGHAM-UR-REHMAN ALIAS ZAIGI versus STATE

Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Dealing with evidence confirming the circumstances, imprisonment in the death cell for six years, the High Court upheld the death penalty by the trial court. Was picked up by the accused. The delay in the registration of the FIR was unknown and the chances of reducing the amount of punishment were reduced, as the accused was imprisoned in the Death Cell for about six years, the FIR registration cannot be delayed because of any person Trying to save lives. Arriving at the police station was considered more important, especially when the complainant's real brother had to arrange for 12 pints of blood, which would have cost time and effort, and the Supreme Court had made no mitigation. Didn't see the situation. Since it was not a case of injury or was intended to be a mystery that the accused was held in prison for death for the sake of mitigation, the cell itself reduced the death penalty to six years for almost six years. Did not create appropriate conditions to do so, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the conviction and sentence awarded by the trial court and the High Court's appeal was dismissed. famous high court advocate from Mohmand lawyer