PAKISTAN TOBACCO BOARD AND ANOTHER versus TAHIR RAZA
Section 30 Pakistan Tobacco Board (Service) Rules, 1985, R20 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) re-employment, jurisdiction of applicants on the Pakistan Tobacco Board, as Secretary in BS 19, And after his retirement and on the recommendation of the Chairman Pakistan Tobacco Board, the applicant was again employed on contract basis, the High Court issued a writ of warrants and thus re-employment was declared illegal. Yes, it was not only President Pakistan, who was a repository of discretion, but also re-employment. Under the R20 of the Pakistan Tobacco Board (Service) Rules 1985, in the public interest only because the applicant was told to be a diligent and efficient officer, he did not give the federal government the power to disregard the rules. Did not challenge the court order. And the request was brought by the Tobacco Board and the secretary raised a voice saying that it was not the federal government that wanted to re-interest, the applicant had the fact that it was in fact the Pakistan Tobacco Board, Started the proposal and wanted to see the applicant in service, the mere notification of the federal government was not enough to answer the quote of the warrant, as issuing such notification was not sufficient to show that Their appointment is in accordance with the law and on these principles the Supreme Court interferes with the decision passed by the High Court. Refused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Sihala lawyer