Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus STATE

Testimony of Section 302 (b) of the testimony reached both the prosecution's witnesses on the occasion and could not explain why the accused felt the need to go to the victim's home, but was not stated in the FIR. During the trial, witnesses exclusively stated that they were carrying a 7mm gun, the Inquestor report did not have an FIR number. In one of his columns, the weapon was not specified. The death column was not mentioned in another column of the Inquest report, and in the other two columns, it was not mentioned that an empty body was lying near the dead body. The Injury report also revealed that the FIR number was left vacant, circumstances had set the event. The prosecution was not observed by any of the witnesses as the prosecution did not raise their case in any way, there was no evidence in the record that there was any dispute between the victim and the accused on the alleged refusal. The defendant was the deceased in the same house and where, on good terms, no witness was presented to support the motive, except witnesses, in the circumstances it was mysterious that the medical evidence supported the case. The victim lost his life due to fireworks injuries. A further police officer said he arrested the suspect after 11 days of incident, while according to prosecutor's testimony, the suspect was the only arrested rifle allegedly recovered from the suspect's living room. After 3 days in the mill was kept for more than a month, and was told that the rifle was forensic science laboratory immigration advocates contact from Kakur Town lawyer