Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN ALIAS ABDUL versus STATE

Significant delay in filing the FIR and post mortem inspection of the deceased's testimony of the benefit of doubt in section 2 (2 (b) evidence was an indication of the fact that time was wasted by the complaining party and the police. - The purchase of an eyewitness and the attachment of them and making the story of the prosecutor complainant, who was the real brother of the accused, was indeed an opportunity witness and the statement of the prosecutor's witness excluded the complainant's presence at the relevant time. Said, the other prosecution's witnesses were also concerned, although the prosecution happened in the area close to the witness's home and He could have been called a natural witness, but the contradictions between his statement and the complainant's statement have gone a long way in pointing out that the ocular account presented by the prosecutor failed to affect the trust's double evidence. Also went a long way in disputing and discrediting the eyewitness testimony presented by the prosecution, in which the discrepancy between the medical evidence and the secular account opened up the whole case of the prosecution and the authenticity of the account through it was serious. Had done It is suspected that the trigger set by the prosecution was far from being established and there was no mutual contribution to the molecular account on the score presented by the chemical examiner and serologist, although it has been confirmed that the recovered sieve was human. Blood stains, but the alleged blood stained wand was not free from serious suspicion because the prosecutor's testimony allegedly was interrogated from the room of the accused's maternal uncle and not from the suspect's home, Section 103 advocate for immigration from Mangal Sada lawyer