Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MASOOD versus S. M. RASHID

Section 9 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Ordinances Volume 1, Chapter 1 suits over property in excess of their entitled sale deed, which is alleged to be the basis of the plaintiff's title in which it did not provide the exact details of the property. Gone. Question Effect Since the plaintiff's title and ownership were not in dispute, retaining the property without a declaration was merely a case of sale in which the suit land was located in the southern part of a particular property, to declare the suit. It was not enough to resolve the dispute that the defendants occupied more property than they were entitled to, requiring accurate and real identification and demarcation of the property for the purpose of visiting and limiting the site. The proper path for the licensed architect / engineer to work was determined. With the help and assistance of City Survey Staff Courts Bell, the plaintiff's property, if any, adjoining, failed to adopt the obligatory course case The case was remanded for re-decision. \ R \ n \ r \ n pakistani advocates Sidhnoti lawyer